Products
Employment & IncomeDOT VerificationsReference ChecksEducation VerificationOffer Letter VerificationMedical Canvassing
Solutions
Pre-Employment ScreeningMortgage LendingTenant ScreeningInsurance SIU
Company
BlogPricing
Request Demo

We built agents for background screening's most soul-crushing job.

What 200,000 verifications taught us: how often applicants stretch the truth, who controls the database layer, and how to finish a check fast.

200,000+
Verifications processed
17
Countries
1.5 million
Calls, emails & faxes
< 24 hours
Average turnaround

See how it works.

From "a human on the phone" to a verified result — the launch film.

Verification still runs on phone calls, emails, and fax. In 2026.

Every time someone gets hired, applies for a mortgage, or runs a background check, somebody has to confirm they actually worked where they said they did. That means millions of phone calls a year to HR and payroll. Leaving voicemails. Sending emails. Sending faxes (yes, in 2026). Waiting days for a callback. Calling back. Getting transferred. Leaving another voicemail.

Background screeners and banks hire whole teams to do this. It's tedious, it's expensive, and turnover is brutal because the work is mind-numbing. We started Superunit because this entire layer of the economy still runs on manual calls and nobody's job is to fix it.

A product leader at a large background screener once told us employment verifications were "soul crushing." We got curious, then analyzed 200,000+ verifications to see where the work actually goes.

State of Employment Verification 2026

What 1.5 million calls, emails, and faxes reveal about employment verification.

We analyzed 200,000+ verifications run through Superunit for banks, mortgage lenders, and background screeners. Eleven findings in three parts: what applicants get wrong, why a database can't fix it, and what it takes to finish the job. They are also why we built Ava.

1.5 million
calls, emails, and faxes
~65%
of verifications required manual outreach
~1 in 3
resolved by an instant database
200,000+
verifications analyzed
PART I
What applicants misrepresent
01 — Applicants inflate their titles
1 in 10
applicants claim a title their employer won't confirm

A submitted title rarely matches the employer's wording exactly, so equivalent titles are grouped together. Cashier to CFO and teller to bank manager are serious misrepresentations; adding senior or lead is usually seniority inflation. Inflation appears about five times as often as serious misrepresentation.

Inflations outnumber understatements 5 to 1.

Categories compare submitted and employer-verified titles. Equivalent wording and normalized role names count as confirmed; material changes in job function count as serious misrepresentation.

02 — Applicants get their dates wrong
1 in 4
verifications have a date off by six months or more

Most of it is memory, not deception: people round to years or blur two stints together. But for a lender calculating employment history or a screener checking a gap, a six month swing is the difference between a clean file and a follow-up.

Measured at month granularity across 34,581 completed verifications from the past six months where both submitted and employer-verified dates were on file. Start dates alone were off by 6+ months 19% of the time.

03 — Employers disclose more than dates and titles
1 in 20
orders surface derogatory information

Most employers confirm the standard facts, but additional questions uncover clear negatives in about 4% of orders and milder flags in another 1%. That information is not stored in an instant employment record. It only surfaces when someone, or something, actually asks.

Of every 100 orders with additional questions, 5 surface derogatory information.

PART II
Why a database can't fix it
04 — Two-thirds never resolve in a database
65%
required manual outreach
~1 in 3
resolved by an instant database source
1.5 million
calls, emails, and faxes doing the rest
When outreach is required, how it gets done
Phone ~46%
Email ~52%Phone ~46%Fax ~1%

Instant databases resolved only about a third of verifications in our data. The other roughly 65% required calls, emails, or faxes to HR and payroll, plus the follow-up needed to finish. Automating only one outreach channel leaves half the problem on the table.

05 — One company dominates third-party verification
73%
of named third-party verifications route through The Work Number
Share of named third-party verification platforms
The Work Number (Equifax)73%
Experian Verify8%
Thomas & Company7%
Vault Verify3%
Other third-party platforms9%

Instant databases resolve about a third of verifications, but within that third one company dominates. When a verification routes through a named third-party platform, 73% of the time it's one company: Equifax's The Work Number. It is a quiet chokepoint most people outside the industry have never heard of. Four brokers fulfill roughly 90% of third-party verifications.

06 — The incumbent is raising the toll
$105
per-verification fee after the Jan 1, 2026 increase
4.2M
employers contributing to The Work Number
149M
TWN verification requests fulfilled in 2024
~$105
per-verification fee after the Jan 1, 2026 increase

The Work Number draws on roughly 4.2 million contributing employers and fulfilled about 149 million verification requests in 2024. On January 1, 2026, Equifax raised its per-verification price again, pushing the customer fee to around $105. The instant path keeps getting more expensive, while employers outside the database still have to be reached directly.

The Work Number scale figures per theworknumber.com (2024). January 1, 2026 price increase per ClearStar and JD Supra / Mitratech; customer fee figure per ClearStar and Pre-Employ.

PART III
What it takes to finish the job
07 — How long it really takes
15.5 hrs
median time to complete a verification
15.5 hrs
median
16%
within the first hour
64%
within 24 hours
~3.8 days
slowest 10%

Half of all verifications come back in under 16 hours, and 1 in 6 lands within the first hour. The slowest 10% take nearly four days, and that tail is what stalls a hire or a loan.

08 — How many tries it really takes
5
median touches to complete a verification
Touches to complete
1 to 3 touches28%
4 to 5 touches24%
6 to 10 touches31%
11+ touches17%

A completed employment verification takes a median of 5 touches, split about evenly between phone calls and emails. Half close in 5 touches or fewer, but 17% need 11 or more.

Based on 79,045 completed verifications. Fax activity appears in 4% of files.

09 — When employers actually pick up
11am
is when completion rates per call peak

The best time to reach an employer is late morning, with completion rates peaking at 11am. They bottom out at 3pm, when a call is about 60% less likely to close the file.

Based on 56,000+ business-hours calls to US and Canadian employers.

10 — The cross-border bottleneck
3.3x
longer in the UK than in the US

A US verification comes back in about 17 hours, while a UK one takes closer to 57. The spread is country by country, with India fastest at about 15 hours and Germany and Ireland near the slow end.

All figures cover completed employment verifications between February 2025 and June 2026, exclude orders stalled on missing applicant data, and are aggregated and anonymized.

11 — Which industries actually answer
24 pts
the completion-rate gap between the most and least responsive industries

Speed is nearly uniform. From the fastest industry to the slowest, median completion time varies by only about six hours. Whether anyone answers is not. Schools and government agencies confirm about 3 in 4 verifications. Restaurants and trucking companies confirm closer to half. Every file in this dataset got the same outreach across phone and email. The difference is on the employer side: whether anyone picks up, and whether they will confirm. The industries hardest to reach by phone are also the ones least covered by instant databases.

Based on 34,400+ verifications with a definitive outcome at employers whose industry could be determined from name, roughly a quarter of decided verifications. A hand-validated sample of the remaining employers confirms the ranking. Industries with fewer than 500 decided verifications are not shown. Excludes orders stalled on missing applicant data, consistent with the rest of this report.

Methodology. Based on 200,000+ verifications run through Superunit for 50+ banks, mortgage lenders, and background screening companies. "Manual outreach" means a verification completed via a live call, email, or fax rather than an instant database source. All figures aggregated and anonymized. This reflects the verification activity of screeners and banks, not a census of all employment. Industry figures cover the subset of verifications where employer industry could be determined from the employer's name, validated against a hand-labeled sample of the remainder.

Cite this data: Superunit, State of Employment Verification 2026, superunit.com/launch

Ava runs the verification end to end.

She does the contact research, calls HR, payroll, and admin departments, navigates phone trees, handles documents, sends emails and faxes, manages compliance, and publishes the results back to your system.

Phone

Calls, navigates IVR menus, talks to people, follows up until she gets an answer.

Email & fax

Sends, tracks, and works email and fax in parallel with the calls.

Verifies employment, income, DOT, references, tenancy, offer letters, and medical canvassing

Serves consumer reporting agencies, banks and mortgage lenders, and tenant screening firms

Publishes results back to your ERP with a clear, auditable record of how the answer was obtained

The result is a verification that comes back in under a day instead of several.

Built for the teams doing the hardest part of verification.

Background screeners & CRAs

Ava replaces the call-center work of verifying employment, references, and education — so your team handles exceptions, not voicemails.

Banks & mortgage lenders

Automate VVOE and written verifications with every call recorded, transcribed, and audit-ready — so verification never stalls a close date.

Tenant screening firms

Employment, income, and rental history verified in hours, not days — fast enough to keep applicants in competitive rental markets.

Real numbers, real customers.

200,000+

verifications processed

17

countries

50+

banks & background screening customers

70%

employment completion rate

< 24 hrs

average turnaround

98%

pilot-to-deployment conversion

"If I have this technology, we will dominate the field."

CRA
Background screening exec
Consumer reporting agency

A mortgage lender scaled loan volume 20x while keeping their verification team at just 2 people — avoiding 12 additional hires.

ML
Mortgage lender
20x volume, team of 2

"You were a game-changer when we were in a really tight spot. We were growing quickly and losing customers because we couldn't meet their expectations."

BG
Screening company
High-growth customer

Verification shouldn't be the thing that stalls the deal.

If you run verifications and want them to move faster, let's talk.